On July 7, President Trump extended the tariff pause to August 1, while China’s deadline remains set for August 12. If no trade deals are finalized by then, tariffs will snap back to elevated, country-specific reciprocal rates.
Progress has been uneven. The European Union—whose trade with the U.S. exceeds $5 billion daily—believed a deal was near, only to face new demands from the Trump administration. This has prompted a more combative stance from Germany, the bloc’s largest economy. Berlin has signaled support for the EU invoking its Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI), a legal mechanism that could authorize aggressive trade and investment restrictions as a last resort.
Meanwhile, U.S.-China talks appear more constructive. The two nations reached a preliminary agreement in June, and both sides have expressed optimism about meeting the deadline. Notably, China’s rare earth exports surged 32% in June, hinting that early progress may already be yielding economic results.
Talks with Canada and Mexico remain turbulent. While both nations have long depended on U.S. trade, companies in each country are now exploring ways to reduce that reliance. One major initiative: a proposed “Northern Corridor” trade route between Canada and Mexico that would bypass U.S. tariffs altogether.
In Japan, an agreement with the U.S. faces fresh uncertainty. Prime Minister Ishiba—who has spearheaded negotiations—may be ousted after his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) coalition lost its majority in the upper house, following a similar loss in the lower house last fall. Political instability could stall or unravel progress.
Perhaps the most contentious front is Brazil. Despite the U.S. holding a trade surplus with the country, Brazil is a critical supplier—accounting for 23% of U.S. beef imports, and leading in key food commodities like coffee and orange juice. With no bilateral talks currently underway, Brazilian officials have acknowledged that a deal may not be reached in time.